Skip to main content

Federal Reserve Internal Inflation Forecast Error

I'm putting together some descriptive statistics for a project (with Cassie Grafstrom) on the forecast errors that Federal Reserve staff make. Is there anything systematic about it?

Our forecast data are from the Fed's Green Book, which is produced before each FOMC meeting. I've created a graph of quarterly forecast errors (simply Forecasts Made 2 Quarters in Advance - Actual Inflation from the Federal Reserves FRED database. Also, forecasts are compared to GNP/GDP deflators and chain-type price indexes, based on changes in what inflation indicators the forecasts are trying to measure across time).


From this graph it seems like the Fed has gotten much better at forecasting inflation two quarters out. However, this is a bit misleading since the absolute level of inflation varies considerably over this time span. In the early part we have the stagflation period with high inflation. Then from the start of the Volker Fed in 1979 absolute inflation decreased. To deal with this problem I simply standardised the errors by making them a proportion of absolute inflation.

We get a much different picture from looking at the second graph. Some thoughts from eyeballing:
  • The Fed tended to underestimate inflation in the 1970s
  • It was then more likely to over estimate than underestimate until around 2000.
  • From around 2000 it tended to drastically underestimate inflation.
The first two observations correspond to what Capistrán (2008) found. However his data didn't go past the late 1990s. The last observation is fairly interesting since it coincides with a period of the Fed steadily lowering the Fed Funds Rate.

More work to follow . . . 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Do Political Scientists Care About Effect Sizes: Replication and Type M Errors

Reproducibility has come a long way in political science. Many major journals now require replication materials be made available either on their websites or some service such as the Dataverse Network. Most of the top journals in political science have formally committed to reproducible research best practices by signing up to the The (DA-RT) Data Access and Research Transparency Joint Statement.This is certainly progress. But what are political scientists actually supposed to do with this new information? Data and code availability does help avoid effort duplication--researchers don't need to gather data or program statistical procedures that have already been gathered or programmed. It promotes better research habits. It definitely provides ''procedural oversight''. We would be highly suspect of results from authors that were unable or unwilling to produce their code/data.However, there are lots of problems that data/code availability requirements do not address.…

Slide: one function for lag/lead variables in data frames, including time-series cross-sectional data

I often want to quickly create a lag or lead variable in an R data frame. Sometimes I also want to create the lag or lead variable for different groups in a data frame, for example, if I want to lag GDP for each country in a data frame.I've found the various R methods for doing this hard to remember and usually need to look at old blogposts. Any time we find ourselves using the same series of codes over and over, it's probably time to put them into a function. So, I added a new command–slide–to the DataCombine R package (v0.1.5).Building on the shift function TszKin Julian posted on his blog, slide allows you to slide a variable up by any time unit to create a lead or down to create a lag. It returns the lag/lead variable to a new column in your data frame. It works with both data that has one observed unit and with time-series cross-sectional data.Note: your data needs to be in ascending time order with equally spaced time increments. For example 1995, 1996, 1997. ExamplesNot…

Showing results from Cox Proportional Hazard Models in R with simPH

Update 2 February 2014: A new version of simPH (Version 1.0) will soon be available for download from CRAN. It allows you to plot using points, ribbons, and (new) lines. See the updated package description paper for examples. Note that the ribbons argument will no longer work as in the examples below. Please use type = 'ribbons' (or 'points' or 'lines'). Effectively showing estimates and uncertainty from Cox Proportional Hazard (PH) models, especially for interactive and non-linear effects, can be challenging with currently available software. So, researchers often just simply display a results table. These are pretty useless for Cox PH models. It is difficult to decipher a simple linear variable’s estimated effect and basically impossible to understand time interactions, interactions between variables, and nonlinear effects without the reader further calculating quantities of interest for a variety of fitted values.So, I’ve been putting together the simPH R p…